![]() ![]() Basically, you have to have enough performance overhead in your systems to support the impact that RPO that you select will create. Enter the number of attempts to run the job and define time intervals between them. So it's all dependent on your environment. In the Automatic retry section, define whether Veeam Backup & Replication or Veeam Agent for Linux (depending on the selected job mode) must attempt to run the backup job again if the job fails for some reason. On the other had, if your Exchange server has 1000 busy users hammering away at it, well, I've seen snapshots grow faster than VMware can remove them. Once backup is done, backup copy has no problem in copying the data offsite. Veeam combines virtual machine backup, replication, recovery, deduplication and compression in one product, enabling us to provide uninterrupted services to users, ensure business continuity and minimize operating costs. If something matches, then it is an occasion. Id set up a continuous replication (or with 15-30 min interval) during working hours and disallow it to run a few hours at night, so the backup job could be done properly during this time. Otherwise if source host or source datastore fails then the replica fails too. This means six open snapshots at the same time, and things can get ugly quite quickly.Īssuming you put all six VM's in a single job, and set it for 15 minutes, and unless your Exchange server is very busy, I'd guess you'd probably be fine and not really notice the impact. As I understand it, replication makes sense if and only if the source (host and datastore) and the target (host and datastore) are completely different. I've seen customers attempt to replicate 6 VM's with 6 separate jobs all on "continuous". ![]() Having one VM with a snapshot has some impact, having 6 VM's with a snapshot would be worse. Not only that, but this customer asked about 6 servers. Veeam Backup & Replication has a full range of enterprise-level data protection functions, which are dedicated to solving the new generation of. Even having a snapshot open has some impact on VM performance with regards to I/O, although this varies tremendously based on the storage capability and hardware integration level (VAAI). Universal licensing makes protecting different types of. New Veeam Backup& Replication v11will be available for download today and all features are included in Veeam Universal License (VUL) the portable, flexible, cloud-ready license for all workloads on premises and in the cloud. Any comments are welcome.Well, you have to be careful with this. Disaster Recovery with Veeam Continuous Data Protection. But if that's the case the latency shouldn't be due to LUN locking should it? I just want to understand this behavior better. I'm assuming this is related to the shared storage Compellent model. But I started looking at other LUNs and noticed that some had identical spikes. The amount of data being written was small so I was thinking it was due to SCSI LUN locking. In other words, make a working copy of it onto another server. Write latency on the LUN I was replicating to went through the roof while it was replicating. Veeam allows you to not only to backup your data, but you can replicate an entire server VM. I stopped the replication and started looking at stats. Replication has the following requirements and limitations: For VMs with VHD disks If you change the size of VM disks on the source VM, Veeam Backup & Replication will delete all available restore points on the VM replica during the next replication job session. In todays computing landscape, continuous replication is an essential part of your overall data availability plan, especially in VM environments. Well, our storage is Compellent so that storage is virtualized so I figured that it was related. Keith, the first thing you should keep in mind is that backup copy job does not simply copy backup files created by the corresponding backup job, but rather synthetically creates restore points on target repository using data available in the source repository, copying the latest VM state during each synchronization interval. After a period of time (an hour?) I noticed that a disk latency alert had triggered on a bunch of VMs. I set up continuous replication to one of our hosts and a Datastore running our production environment (Cisco UCS and Compellent SAN). The vcenter server is on a stand-alone host and running as a VM. It turns out it was but I had some issues that I'd like the community's input on. I was originally headed down the road of SQL replication but had issues and thought that Veeam would be a lot easier. We don't really use the replication feature much as we are replicating via SAN, but I thought that I could use the Veeam replication to protect my vcenter server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |